Why Abraham? That is the question that
haunts us when we read the opening of this week’s parsha. Here is the key
figure in the story of our faith, the father of our nation, the hero of
monotheism, held holy not only by Jews but by Christians and Muslims also. Yet
there seems to be nothing in the Torah’s description of his early life to give
us a hint as to why he was singled out to be the person to whom God said, “I
will make you into a great nation … and all peoples on earth will be blessed
through you.”
This is surpassingly strange. The Torah leaves us in no
doubt as to why God chose Noah: “Noah was a righteous man, blameless in
his generations; Noah walked with God.” It also gives us a clear indication as
to why God chose Moses. We see him as a young man, both in Egypt and Midian,
intervening whenever he saw injustice, whoever perpetrated it and whoever it
was perpetrated against. God told the prophet Jeremiah, “Before I formed you in
the womb I knew you; before you were born I set you apart; I
have appointed you as a Prophet to the nations.” These were obviously
extraordinary people. There is no such intimation in the case of Abraham. So
the Sages, commentators, and philosophers through the ages were forced to
speculate, to fill in the glaring gap in the narrative, offering their own
suggestions as to what made Abraham different.
There are three primary explanations. The first is Abraham the
Iconoclast, the breaker of idols. This is based on a speech by
Moses’ successor, Joshua, towards the end of the book that bears his name. It
is a passage given prominence in the Haggadah on Seder night: “Long ago your
ancestors, including Terah the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond
the Euphrates River and worshipped other gods” (Josh. 24:2).
Abraham’s father Terah was an idol worshipper. According to the Midrash, he
made and sold idols. One day Abraham smashed all the idols and left, leaving
the stick with which he did so in the hand of the biggest idol. When his father
returned and queried who had broken his gods, Abraham blamed the biggest idol.
“Are you making fun of me?” demanded his father. “Idols cannot do anything.”
“In that case,” asked the young Abraham, “why do you worship them?”
On this view, Abraham was the first person to challenge the
idols of the age. There is something profound about this insight. Jews,
believers or otherwise, have often been iconoclasts. Some of the most
revolutionary thinkers – certainly in the modern age – have been Jews. They had
the courage to challenge the received wisdom, think new thoughts and see the
world in unprecedented ways, from Einstein in physics to Freud in
psychoanalysis to Schoenberg in music, to Marx in economics, and Amos Tversky
and Daniel Kahneman in behavioural economics. It is as if, deep in our cultural
intellectual DNA, we had internalised what the Sages said about Abraham ha-Ivri,
“the Hebrew,” that it meant he was on one side and all the rest of the world on
the other.[1]
The second view is set out by Maimonides in the Mishnah
Torah: Abraham the Philosopher. In an age when people had lapsed
from humanity’s original faith in one God into idolatry, one person stood
against the trend, the young Abraham, still a child: “As soon as this mighty
man was weaned he began to busy his mind … He wondered: How is it possible that
this planet should continuously be in motion and have no mover? … He had no teacher,
no one to instruct him … until he attained the way of truth … and knew that
there is One God … When Abraham was forty years old he recognised his Creator.”[2] According
to this, Abraham was the first Aristotelian, the first metaphysician, the first
person to think his way through to God as the force that moves the sun and all
the stars.
This is strange, given the fact that there is very little
philosophy in Tanach, with the exception of wisdom books like Proverbs, Kohelet
and Job. Maimonides’ Abraham can sometimes look more like Maimonides than
Abraham. Yet of all people, Friedrich Nietzsche, who did not like Judaism very
much, wrote the following:
Europe owes the Jews no small thanks for making people think
more logically and for establishing cleanlier intellectual habits… Wherever
Jews have won influence they have taught men to make finer distinctions, more
rigorous inferences, and to write in a more luminous and cleanly fashion; their
task was ever to bring a people “to listen to raison.”[3]
The explanation he gave is fascinating. He said that only in
the arena of reason did Jews face a level playing-field. Everywhere else, they
encountered race and class prejudice. “Nothing,” he wrote, “is more democratic
than logic.” So Jews became logicians, and according to Maimonides, it began
with Abraham.
However there is a third view, set out in the Midrash on the
opening verse of our parsha:
“The Lord said to Abram: Leave your land, your birthplace
and your father’s house . . .” To what may this be compared? To a man who was
travelling from place to place when he saw a palace in flames. He wondered, “Is
it possible that the palace lacks an owner?” The owner of the palace looked out
and said, “I am the owner of the palace.” So Abraham our father said, “Is it
possible that the world lacks a ruler?” The Holy One, blessed be He, looked out
and said to him, “I am the ruler, the Sovereign of the universe.”
This is an enigmatic Midrash. It is far from obvious what it
means. In my book A Letter in the Scroll (published in
Britain as Radical Then, Radical Now) I argued that Abraham was struck
by the contradiction between the order of the universe – the palace – and the
disorder of humanity – the flames. How, in a world created by a good God, could
there be so much evil? If someone takes the trouble to build a palace, do they
leave it to the flames? If someone takes the trouble to create a universe, does
He leave it to be disfigured by His own creations? On this reading, what moved
Abraham was not philosophical harmony but moral discord. For Abraham, faith
began in cognitive dissonance. There is only one way of resolving this
dissonance: by protesting evil and fighting it.
That is the poignant meaning of the Midrash when it says
that the owner of the palace looked out and said, “I am the owner of the
palace.” It is as if God were saying to Abraham: I need you to
help Me to put out the flames.
How could that possibly be so? God is all-powerful. Human
beings are all too powerless. How could God be saying to Abraham, I need you to
help Me put out the flames?
The answer is that evil exists because God gave humans the gift of
freedom. Without freedom, we would not disobey God’s laws. But at
the same time, we would be no more than robots, programmed to do whatever our
Creator designed us to do. Freedom and its misuse are the theme of Adam and
Eve, Cain and Abel, and the generation of the Flood.
Why did God not intervene? Why did He not stop the first
humans eating the forbidden fruit, or prevent Cain from killing Abel? Why did
the owner of the palace not put out the flames?
Because, by giving us freedom, He bound Himself from
intervening in the human situation. If He stopped us every time we were about
to do wrong, we would have no freedom. We would never mature, never learn from
our errors, never become God’s image. We exist as free agents only because of
God’s tzimtzum, His self-limitation. That is why, within the terms
with which He created humankind, He cannot put out the flames of human evil.
He needs our help. That is why He chose Abraham. Abraham was the
first person in recorded history to protest the injustice of the world in the
name of God, rather than accept it in the name of God. Abraham
was the man who said: “Shall the Judge of all the earth not do justly?” Where
Noah accepted, Abraham did not. Abraham is the man of whom God said, “I have
chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after
him to keep the way of the Lord by doing what is right and just.”
Abraham was the father of a nation, a faith, a civilisation, marked throughout
the ages by what Albert Einstein called “an almost fanatical love of justice.”
I believe that Abraham is the father of
faith, not as acceptance but as protest – protest at the flames that threaten
the palace, the evil that threatens God’s gracious world. We fight those flames
by acts of justice and compassion that deny evil its victory and bring the
world that is a little closer to the world that ought to be.
Shabbat Shalom
[1] Bereishit Rabbah (Vilna), 42:8.
[2] Mishneh Torah, Laws of Idolatry, chapter 1
[3] Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, translated with commentary by Walter Kaufmann, New York, Vintage, 1974, 291.