Home News Atlanta Lawsuit Alleges Carter Center Provided ‘Material Support’ For Terrorism 

Lawsuit Alleges Carter Center Provided ‘Material Support’ For Terrorism 

Lawsuit Alleges Carter Center Provided ‘Material Support’ For Terrorism 
Yifa Segal, lawyer and director of the International Legal Forum, speaking during the visit of Raheel Raza Muslim Pakistani Canadian journalist, author and interfaith discussion leader. Jan 12, 2016. Photo by Hillel Maeir/TPS

Lawsuit Alleges Carter Center Provided ‘Material Support’ For Terrorism

Written by TPS on April 25, 2018


The Carter Center, an NGO founded by former United States President Jimmy Carter, received over $30 million from USAID by fraudulent certifications and provided material support for terrorism, according to a lawsuit filed by the US based Zionist Advocacy Center and Yifa Segal, director of the Jerusalem-based International Legal Forum.

The case was submitted under the False Claims Act (FCA) in 2015, but was until recently under seal. The relators argue that the Carter Center, which they state “is well known for its anti-Israel views and activities” is in violation of the certifications and assurances that must be signed by USAID recipients and that include a broad and strict definition of material support for terrorism.

Segal explained to Tazpit Press Service (TPS) that the definition of material support was established by the United States Supreme Court decision of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.

In the precedent-setting ruling, the Supreme Court found that although the Humanitarian Law Project sought to help the Kurdistan Workers’ Party in Turkey and Sri Lanka’s Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam learn how to peacefully resolve conflicts, Congress had intended to prevent aid to such groups on the principle that any assistance could help to legitimate a terrorist organization and free up its resources for terrorist activities.

The Carter Center submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in connection with Holder voicing its concern that if the statute prohibiting material support were upheld, it would jeopardize the Center’s work. The Court ruled against the Carter Center’s position, yet, Segal told TPS, the NGO has continued its illegal activities, including, repeatedly hosting terrorist representatives at its facilities; offering expert assistance to Palestinian factions, including Hamas and the Popular Front For the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP); providing expert mediation services to Hamas in an effort to negotiate reconciliation between the terrorist organization and Fatah.

Segal noted that some of the Hamas and PFLP representatives hosted by the Carter Center

are wanted terrorists and that hosting them means also harboring them. Furthermore, she said, such meetings provide terrorist representatives with credibility, networking, status, and potential political power.

Segal added that while the the Carter Center may believe that this kind of assistance is good policy, under Holder, it constitutes a clear violation of the law, and makes the NGO un-eligible for USAID funding.

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has decided to act for dismissal of the case, stating that while “representatives of the Carter Center have engaged in discussions and meetings with members of Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the primary purposes of these activities were to facilitate dialog between the Palestinian factions and to urge Hamas to recognize Israel’s right to exist, forgo violence, and accept previous peace agreements.”

Countering the DOJ’s motion, Segal said that “according to US law, the provision of expert advice or assistance otherwise known as material support, even if meant to promote peaceful and lawful conduct, can facilitate terrorism.”

Adding that she believed the motion is motivated primarily by discomfort with prosecuting a former president, she added: “The logic is simple. Any service provided to a terror group can help free up other resources within the organization. “Taking into account that a terror organization, ultimately, aims at executing acts of terror, by freeing resources from other needs, you are very likely to contribute to the organization’s illegal acts of violence, whether you intended to do so or not.”

A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for April 25.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com