Home Blog Page 525

Israel is ready for ‘every scenario’ in Gaza, says Netanyahu after rocket attack

0

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held talks with top security officials about Gaza and Jerusalem on Saturday after Palestinian terrorists fired 36 rockets at Israel early Saturday morning.

He instructed officials to be ready for “every scenario” in Gaza.

In Jerusalem, he said Israel would guarantee “freedom of worship” for everyone, and he appealed for calm.

“We ask now for people to obey the law and I call for a calming of tempers on all sides,” he added referring to violent nightly riots launched by Arabs during the Muslim month of Ramadan

The U.N. envoy to the region, Tor Wennesland, condemned the violence and said the United Nations was working with all sides to restore calm.

“The provocative acts across Jerusalem must cease. The indiscriminate launching of rockets towards Israeli population centers violates international law and must stop immediately,” he said.

“I reiterate my call upon all sides to exercise maximum restraint and avoid further escalation, particularly during the holy month of Ramadan and this politically charged time for all.”

Meanwhile, Israeli chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Aviv Kochavi, is weighing “a series of steps for possible responses,” and preparations if the situation continued to escalate, the military said in a statement.

He also postponed a trip to the United States that was scheduled for Sunday.

The U.S. also appealed for calm, while neighboring Jordan, which serves as the custodian for the Jewish people’s holiest site, the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, condemned Israel’s actions.

Jerusalem, home to holy sites sacred to Jews, Christians and Muslims, has long been a flashpoint in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In 2014, similar tensions erupted into a 50-day war between Israel and Gaza’s ruling Hamas militant group.

In response, the army said fighter jets and helicopters struck a number of Hamas targets in Gaza, including an underground facility and rocket launchers.

Hamas did not claim responsibility for the rocket fire, but because the terror groups holds itself out as the ruling faction in Gaza, Israel holds it responsible for all fire emanating from the territory.

(World Israel News).

Top IDF general postpones trip to US amid escalating tensions with Gaza Strip

0

At least 36 rockets were launched into Israel starting Friday night,
with most landing in open territory.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Aviv Kochavi has postponed a scheduled trip to the United States after Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip launched dozens of rockets into Israel over the weekend, significantly escalating tensions between Hamas and Jerusalem.

Takeoff for the trip, which would have marked Kochavi’s first since becoming the IDF’s top general, was scheduled for Sunday.

Kochavi was set to meet top US defense officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, with Iran’s nuclear program and its threat for the entire region at the top of the agenda.

But starting in the late hours of Friday night, communities in the south were greeted with a cacophony of red alert sirens after Palestinian militants began launching projectiles into Israeli territory.

The IDF said later Saturday morning that at least 36 rockets were fired in total during multiple overnight salvos, with most landing in open uninhabited terrain. At least six were intercepted by the Iron Dome missile defense system.

In response, the military said it successfully targeted rocket launchers and underground infrastructure belonging to the Gaza-based terror organization.

No casualties were reported on either side of the skirmishes.

This new escalation in hostilities comes days after numerous clashes have broken out in Jerusalem and the West Bank involving Palestinian and Israeli civilians as well as Israeli security forces.

(i24 News).

Smotrich: Maybe it’s time to replace Netanyahu

0

The Chairman of the Religious Zionist Party criticizes PM Netanyahu following his response to the recent wave of terror in Jerusalem.

The chairman of the Religious Zionist Party, Bezalel Smotrich, on Saturday night attacked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following his response to the wave of terror that is sweeping eastern Jerusalem.

“Say, after countless terrorist incidents and lynchings by the Arab enemy in recent days and after a barrage of missiles from Gaza towards communities in the south, Netanyahu actually called tonight for calm on all sides? Maybe it really is time to replace him.”

The Likud said in response, “The Prime Minister and the Likud donated three seats to the Religious Zionist party and reserved another MK for them on the Likud list, and Bezalel Smotrich is not a partner to the most sensitive security assessments. So, it would be better for Smotrich to show a minimum of modesty, responsibility and gratitude and not to attack the Prime Minister who works day and night for the benefit of Israel’s security.”

MK Miki Zohar also responded to Smotrich and said, “One of the main characteristics of ungratefulness. You passed the electoral threshold because the Likud gave you three seats, a little modesty wouldn’t hurt.”

Smotrich then responded to Zohar and said, “Miki, if everyone here who claims to have ‘donated’ three seats to me would have actually done it, I would have had 15 seats today… So enough already with this nonsense. Bibi did not do me any personal favors and I emphasized throughout that I am not personally committed to him but to the values of the Right and my religious Zionism.”

“Abandonment of the State of Israel and the security of its citizens to Arab rioters and then having a Prime Minister who feels like he is from the UN is not part of my values.”

“I am sorry. Just like the formation of a government that will depend on supporters of terrorism who deny our existence here and support to these rioters. And in one sentence that the time has come for you and your friends to internalize: I am a right-wing man, not a Bibist.”

(Arutz 7).

Rabbi Jonathan Gewirtz – Perfect Timing

0

Operation Inspiration

 

There’s an expression, “all in good time,” which is meant to encourage people to be patient when waiting for something because things don’t necessarily happen when we want them to, but rather when the time is right. If I were to choose a Jewish version, the first to come to mind is “Davar b’ito mah tov,” from Mishlei (15:23), meaning “how good is a thing in its time!” 

However, this isn’t exactly applicable as the meforshim explain this to be a “word” not a “thing,” and the specific word or words in question are “Yehi Ohr, let there be light.” It is a reference to Hashem creating the world (according to R’ Shimon Bar Yochai,) and making light which Hashem saw was “good.” The Malbim’s approach is that the Posuk is talking about a Chacham who is able to use his wisdom at the right time to put it into practice, and again, it’s a word, not a “thing.”

What we should likely be thinking of is a different Posuk, one in Koheles (3:11), “Es hakol asa yafa b’ito, He made everything good in its time.” That is to say, everything in Creation has its time and place when it is best used. I think the perfect examples of these are Hashgacha Pratis, or as my daughter calls it, HP.

When we see things work out to the most minute perfection, we see Hashem’s fingerprints on the world and it is encouraging. It helps us fend off the seeming chaos of the world and shut out the despair and frustration we might have if everything was in the hand of people. 

A friend just went to a funeral of a 95-year-old woman. Her parents had been childless and went to R’ Shayele of Kerestir for a bracha. He gave them a bracha and a special “gebentched” coin. They merited to have a daughter but R’ Shayele didn’t live to see her. That girl grew up to have a beautiful family of her own, becoming a mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother. She passed away this year on R’ Shayele’s Yahrtzeit. Surely it was not a coincidence but HP – Hashem’s tipping His hand – to recall the zechus of that tzaddik in this woman’s life. 

I had another story of HP this week too. My friend is a Rav and Rosh Kollel in Israel. The shul obtained a larger safe for their Sifrei Torah and the Paroches, the embroidered velvet cover from their old safe, was much too small. Plans were made to order a new one but one of the Kollel fellows mentioned it to his parents. As luck would have it (wink-wink) they had donated a Paroches to a shul which had since closed down and they had it in their home. If they could get it from New York to Israel it could be used in the meantime. 

My friend reached out to ask if I knew anyone coming to Israel. I found someone and he was able to bring not only the Paroches, but a matching cover for the Bima which the donors got from their friends. The fellow left Thursday night and by Friday at 11am, the velvet covers (which fit perfectly, by the way!) were installed in the new Bais Midrash and the room was complete. I know that you’ll say, “OK, that’s nice, but what’s so special about the story? Things fell into place.”

Well, I haven’t yet mentioned that originally there was another person I had in mind but he wasn’t going until after Shabbos. “So? So it will get there after Shabbos.” Ahhh, but this way the Paroches was adorning the Aron kodesh by Friday morning… which was the Yahrtzeit of the woman for whom it had been dedicated originally! Talk about timing.

But it gets better. You see, the person we sent the Paroches with lives in Eretz Yisrael, in the same town as the Kollel, so they didn’t have to get it from Yerushalayim. And I only found out he was in America because on the previous Sunday, I’d gone to daven Mincha somewhere that ended up not having a minyan at that time, and guess who walked in thirty seconds behind me? This fellow who ended up being the Shliach for getting the Paroches to its new home. Without that happening I’d never have thought of him. But let’s take it further.

The reason I had to daven earlier than I normally would is that I had a vort (engagement party) to go to. So, this choson and kallah had met weeks or months before, and got engaged when they did, and the party was scheduled when it was by HaKadosh Baruch Hu, in part, so that this Paroches could be hung up for the Yahrtzeit of this woman. Only Hashem has such perfect timing.

Which now makes sense to me why the phrase, “Davar B’ito Mah Tov,” came to mind. Because when things like this happen, and for a moment, a spotlight is cast on Hashem’s myriad machinations and orchestrations behind the scenes, we see with complete clarity that Hashem created and still runs the world, just like when He said, “Let there be light,” and it was – and still is – very good.

© 2021 – All Rights Reserved

Did you enjoy this column? Feedback is welcome and appreciated. E-mail info@JewishSpeechWriter.com to share your thoughts. You never know when you may be the lamp that enlightens someone else.

Elli Schwarcz – Eternal Life

0
This week’s Torah reading contains an important phrase- one that provides a key to successful Jewish living:

And you shall keep My statutes and My laws- which a person must do, and live by them

-Acharei Mot
What does it mean to “live by” the mitzvot? The Talmud cites this verse as the source for an important law: One does not need to sacrifice his life in order to keep the Torah (with some important exceptions);  a person confronted with a choice of either violating the Torah or dying (e.g. someone threatens to kill him unless he eats non-kosher food) can “live by” the Torah and need not give up his life for its sake.

“And live by them…”:
[Meaning:] Not that you should die through them.

-Gemara Yoma 85b
Now, despite this well known teaching, Rashi here explains this ‘living’ in a different manner: according to the Midrash Sifra..

“And live by them”:
In the World-To-Come
. For if you say [that the verse refers to living] in this world, does he not eventually die?

Commentators ask that these two interpretations seem to completely conflict with each other. Is Rashi’s quote of the Sifra actually intended to convey the verse’s simple meaning? How could that square with the Talmud’s teaching?

Which world, which ‘life’, does this phrase really connote?

Rav Shimon Schwab (Germany, United States; 1908-1995) says that this question is based on a mistaken assumption- that life in this world is completely different than life in the next world. The truth is that this world and the next are very much connected. In fact, says Rav Schwab, death is really nothing more than the removal of the physical body from the spiritual soul (as the soul returns to its spiritual Source, and the body to its physical, earthly origins)- a process similar to removing a coat. Just as one takes off his raincoat after coming inside from the rain, so is our body- a physical layer necessary for living in this material world- simply separated from the soul when a person dies, as it is no longer needed. Then, the soul is left to shine on its own, unimpeded by the body.

Now, the reason we can understand death as almost insignificant is because we recognize that the soul is the real person and the physical body is merely there to aid in surviving a physical world. This attitude is what causes us to describe a person who dies as ‘niftar’- in English, ‘passed away‘; he or she is not gone, because the soul still exists. Rather, that soul- and therefore the person himself- has merely moved on to another location.

Rav Schwab uses this priniciple to erase the question we have been dealing with. There is no contradiction between a life of mitzvot in this world on the one hand, and life in the World to Come. Instead, a life lived well entails a seamless continuum in which a soul kept holy by keeping the Torah continues to live on in the next world.

With this in mind, says Rav Schwab, we now understand a famous dictum of our Rabbis:

“All of B’nei Israel have a share to the World to Come.”
-Mishnah Sanhedrin, Chapter 11

Grammatically, it would seem more correct to say that everyone has a portion ‘in’ the World- to- Come; what is meant by ‘to’ the World- to- Come? While other commentators offer different answers, Rav Schwab teaches as follows: even someone still living a physical existence in this world can already be said to be going ‘towards’ the next world. One who lives according to the Torah has essentially already attached himself to an eternal existence, and is already on the road to his or her eventual portion in the World to Come.

Similarly, says Rav Schwab, a person described by our Rabbis as a ‘Ben Olam Habah‘- roughly, ‘a member of the World to Come’, is so titled not just because he or she will one day merit reward from good deeds, but because such a person is already living the spiritual attachment to Hashem that will be more fully enjoyed after death.

Rav Schwab also adds new meaning to a well-known teaching, in light of this lesson:

This world is similar to a hallway before the World to Come; prepare yourself in the hallway so that you may enter the palace.

-Mishnah, Avot 4:18

-Again, a person with the correct mindset, living a Torah life and clinging to Hashem, is truly preparing to move into the next room. Such a person, a ‘Ben Olam Habah’, appreciates that we are merely passing through this world- and that the journey is already underway.

May we all make the correct choices and maintain our focus- so that we indeed merit eternal life. May we live with the happiness that comes from knowing that a live well-lived is truly eternal.
…And an eternal life He planted within us…
– Concluding blessing on a communal Torah reading

Have a great Shabbat!

Elli Schwarcz
Elli Schwarcz is an alumnus of the Toras Moshe, Ner Israel, and Carteret Yeshivos, and has been involved in Jewish outreach for almost 15 years. He is a Hebrew School and English Language Arts teacher, and has a Master’s Degree in Counseling from Johns Hopkins University. Of all his pursuits, Elli most enjoys teaching high-level Jewish thought and Talmud to teenage boys, exposing them to the beauty and wisdom of their heritage while highlighting their own ability to engage in advanced Torah learning. Elli lives in Lakewood, New Jersey, with his wife and children.

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks: Sprints and Marathons: Acharei Mot–Kedoshim 5781

Rabbi Sacks zt’’l had prepared a full year of Covenant & Conversation for 5781, based on his book Lessons in Leadership. The Rabbi Sacks Legacy Trust will continue to distribute these weekly essays, so that people all around the world can keep on learning and finding inspiration in his Torah.

It was a unique, unrepeatable moment of leadership at its highest height. For forty days Moses had been communing with God, receiving from Him the Law written on tablets of stone. Then God informed him that the people had just made a Golden Calf. He would have to destroy them. It was the worst crisis of the wilderness years, and it called for every one of Moses’ gifts as a leader.

First, he prayed to God not to destroy the people. God agreed. Then he went down the mountain and saw the people cavorting around the Calf. Immediately, he smashed the tablets. He burned the Calf, mixed its ashes with water and made the people drink. Then he called for people to join him.

The Levites heeded the call and carried out a bloody punishment in which three thousand people died. Then Moses went back up the mountain and prayed for forty days and nights. Then for a further forty days he stayed with God while a new set of tablets was engraved. Finally, he came down the mountain on the tenth of Tishri, carrying the new tablets with him as a visible sign that God’s covenant with Israel remained.

This was an extraordinary show of leadership, at times bold and decisive, at others slow and persistent. Moses had to contend with both sides, inducing the Israelites to do teshuvah and God to exercise forgiveness. At that moment he was the greatest ever embodiment of the name Israel, meaning one who wrestles with God and with people and prevails.

The good news is: there once was a Moses. Because of him, the people survived. The bad news is: what happens when there is no Moses? The Torah itself says: “No other Prophet has risen in Israel like Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face” (Deut. 34:10).

What do you do in the absence of heroic leadership? That is the problem faced by every nation, corporation, community and family. It is easy to think, “What would Moses do?” But Moses did what he did because he was what he was. We are not Moses. That is why every human group that was once touched by greatness faces a problem of continuity. How does it avoid a slow decline?

The answer is given in this week’s parsha. The day Moses descended the mountain with the second tablets was to be immortalised when its anniversary became the holiest of days, Yom Kippur. On this day, the drama of teshuvah and kapparah, repentance and atonement, was to be repeated annually. This time, though, the key figure would not be Moses but Aaron, not the Prophet but the High Priest.

That is how you perpetuate a transformative event: by turning it into a ritual. Max Weber called this the routinisation of charisma.[1] A once-and-never-again moment becomes a once-and-ever-again ceremony.

As James MacGregor Burns puts it in his classic work, Leadership: “The most lasting tangible act of leadership is the creation of an institution – a nation, a social movement, a political party, a bureaucracy – that continues to exert moral leadership and foster needed social change long after the creative leaders are gone.”[2]

There is a remarkable Midrash in which various Sages put forward their idea of klal gadol ba-Torah, “the great principle of the Torah.” Ben Azzai says it is the verse, “This is the book of the chronicles of man: On the day that God created man, He made him in the likeness of God” (Gen. 5:1).

Ben Zoma says that there is a more embracing principle, “Listen, Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.”

Ben Nannas says there is a yet more embracing principle: “Love your neighbour as yourself.”

Ben Pazzi says we find a more embracing principle still: “The first sheep shall be offered in the morning, and the second sheep in the afternoon” (Exodus 29:39) – or, as we might say today, Shacharit, Mincha and Maariv. In a word: “routine”. The passage concludes: The law follows Ben Pazzi.[3]

The meaning of Ben Pazzi’s statement is clear: all the high ideals in the world – the human person as God’s image, belief in God’s unity, and the love of neighbours – count for little until they are turned into habits of action that become habits of the heart. We can all recall moments of insight or epiphany when we suddenly understood what life is about, what greatness is, and how we would like to live. A day, a week, or at most a year later the inspiration fades and becomes a distant memory and we are left as we were before, unchanged.

Judaism’s greatness is that it gave space to both Prophet and Priest, to inspirational figures on the one hand, and on the other, daily routines – the halachah – that take exalted visions and turn them into patterns of behaviour that reconfigure the brain and change how we feel and who we are.

One of the most unusual passages I have ever read about Judaism written by a non-Jew occurs in William Rees-Mogg’s book on macro-economics, The Reigning Error.[4] Rees-Mogg (1928-2012) was a financial journalist who became editor of The Times, chairman of the Arts Council and vice-chairman of the BBC. Religiously he was a committed Catholic.

He begins the book with a completely unexpected paean of praise for halachic Judaism. He explains his reason for doing so. Inflation, he says, is a disease of inordinacy, a failure of discipline, in this case in relation to money.

What makes Judaism unique, he continues, is its legal system. This has been wrongly criticised by Christians as drily legalistic. In fact, Jewish law was essential for Jewish survival because it “provided a standard by which action could be tested, a law for the regulation of conduct, a focus for loyalty and a boundary for the energy of human nature.”

All sources of energy, most notably nuclear energy, need some form of containment. Without this, they become dangerous. Jewish law has always acted as a container for the spiritual and intellectual energy of the Jewish people. That energy “has not merely exploded or been dispersed; it has been harnessed as a continuous power.” What Jews have, he argues, modern economies lack: a system of self-control that allows economies to flourish without booms and crashes, inflation and recession.

The same applies to leadership.

In Good to Great, management theorist Jim Collins argues that what the great companies have in common is a culture of discipline. In Great By Choice, he uses the phrase “the 20-Mile March” meaning that outstanding organizations plan for the marathon, not the sprint.

Confidence, he says, “comes not from motivational speeches, charismatic inspiration, wild pep rallies, unfounded optimism, or blind hope.”[5] It comes from doing the deed, day after day, year after year. Great companies use disciplines that are specific, methodical and consistent. They encourage their people to be self-disciplined and responsible. They do not over-react to change, be it for good or bad. They keep their eye on the far horizon.

Above all, they do not depend on heroic, charismatic leaders who at best lift the company for a while but do not provide it with the strength-in-depth they need to flourish in the long run.

The classic instance of the principles articulated by Burns, Rees-Mogg and Collins is the transformation that occurred between Ki Tissa and Acharei Mot, between the first Yom Kippur and the second, between Moses’ heroic leadership and the quiet, understated priestly discipline of an annual day of repentance and atonement.

Turning ideals into codes of action that shape habits of the heart is what Judaism and leadership are about. Never lose the inspiration of the Prophets, but never lose, either, the routines that turn ideals into acts and dreams into achieved reality.

Sources:

[1] See Max Weber, Economy and Society (Oakland, Calif.: University of California Press, 1978), 246ff.

[2] James MacGregor Burns, Leadership (New York: Harper, 1978), 454.

[3] The passage is cited in the Introduction to the commentary HaKotev to Ein Yaakov, the collected aggadic passages of the Talmud. It is also quoted by Maharal in Netivot Olam, Ahavat Re’a 1.

[4] William Rees-Mogg, The Reigning Error: The Crisis of World Inflation (London: Hamilton, 1974), 9–13.

[5] Jim Collins, Good to Great (New York: HarperBusiness, 2001); Great by Choice (New York: HarperCollins, 2011), 55.

 

What really happened in the skies near Israel’s nuclear reactor?

0

Former intelligence officer Tal Beeri tells JNS that “an alternative and unfounded narrative of a warning strike” on Dimona’s nuclear research center is playing out in media channels affiliated to the Iran-led axis. Days before the incident, two suspicious Iranian cargo planes landed in Damascus.

Two days before a Syrian surface-to-air missile flew into southern Israel in response to reported Israeli airstrikes on targets in the Damascus area, two suspicious Iranian cargo planes landed at Damascus International Airport, likely carrying advanced weapons, a former IDF intelligence officer has told JNS.

Early on Thursday morning, international media reports said that the Israeli Air Force hit a number of unknown targets in Syria, which triggered a Syrian SA-5 surface-to-air missile battery to fire on the Israeli aircraft.

Maj. (res.) Tal Beeri, director of the research department at the Alma research center, which uses open-source material to shed light on security threats to Israel emanating from Syria and Lebanon, spent 20 years in IDF intelligence specializing in Lebanon and Syria. He said that according to online public flight tracking programs, the Iranian cargo planes landed at the Damascus airport on April 20.

“Those who follow Iranian cargo planes movements from Iran to Damascus are not surprised by airstrikes that follow them,” he said. “We don’t know what the specific target of the Israeli strike was, but I am certainly linking it to the arrival of the cargo planes,” added Beeri.

During the reported attack, as in many previous Israeli strikes, Syrian air-defense missile batteries launched interceptor missiles.

“The SA-5 is an old, Russian-built surface-to-air missile,” explained Beeri. “It can reach a range of some 400 kilometers and an altitude of some 40,000 feet. It has a 200-kilogram warhead.”

The missile is originally designed to shoot down larger air targets, like transport planes.

“If it doesn’t strike a target in the air, it continues to fly until it falls because its flight trajectory ends,” said Beeri. “We saw in recent years quite a few incidents during airstrikes in which these missile launches from Syria had unexpected results. Airstrikes can lead to Syrian missiles reaching all sorts of surprising places.”

Examples include the SA-5 missile that was successfully intercepted by an Israeli Arrow 2 missile over the Jordan Valley in March 2017, and the SA-5 missile that knocked an Israeli F-16 out of the sky in February 2018. During that same incident, a second SA-5 missile fell in the Greek-populated region of Cyprus.

In September 2018, recalled Beeri, an SA-5 missile hit a Russian intelligence-gathering aircraft while trying to hit an Israeli jet with tragic and deadly consequences.

In July 2019, an SA-5 fired from Syria fell on the Turkish-populated side of Cyprus.

“From our understanding of the incident, the SA-5 fired [on April 22] was launched south of Damascus. The missile did not hit any aircraft, and its trajectory took it over Jordan. When it was over the Dead Sea, it crossed over into Israeli territory and traveled in a straight line until reaching the Beersheva region,” said Beeri.

At that stage, warning sirens went off in the region of the Bedouin village of Abu Qrenat, in the northwest Negev, stated the Israel Defense Forces.

An Israeli air-defense system fired a missile at the Syrian missile but failed to strike it, according to Defense Minister Benny Gantz.

“The IDF acted against necessary assets [in Syria], preventing potential harm against Israel,” he said during a press conference. “An SA-5 crossed border. There was an attempt to intercept that didn’t succeed. The air force is investigating the incident. In most such cases, we see other results.”

Shortly afterwards, the IAF “struck the battery from which the missile was launched and additional Syrian surface-to-air batteries in the area,” the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said in a statement.

‘Revenge’ is a totally baseless claim

A Syrian military source told the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) that the IAF hit targets in the Damascus and Golan regions.

SANA said in its reports that four Syrian soldiers sustained injuries in an Israeli strike south of Damascus and that the attack also caused some damage.

Beeri added that there were also indications that a Syrian officer at the rank of captain was killed in the attack.

Nevertheless, he said, when taken into the context of four incidents in the past three years, even such “‘unusual” incidents become somewhat routine.

“The fact is that the Syrian missile flew until it could not fly any further. This time, it reached the Beersheva region,” he stated.

This has not stopped social-media accounts and media channels affiliated with the radical Shi’ite-Iranian axis from holding what Beeri described as a “celebration” over the incident.

The narrative of “revenge”—in which a surface-to-surface ballistic missile was deliberately fired at the Dimona-based Negev Nuclear Research Center as a “warning strike” to prove what the Iranian axis can do—has taken hold there.

“Here is the ‘revenge,’ but this is totally baseless claim,” said Beeri. “They are linking the incident to recent incidents at the Natanz nuclear site in Iran,” he added, referring to the April 11 blast that tore through the facility, taking thousands of Iranian centrifuges offline and for which Iran has blamed Israel.

Asked if this alternative narrative could still provide a face-saving outlet for Iran, Beeri said that public sentiments in narratives can, in principle, calm desires for revenge, but only if formal decision-makers and military chiefs in Iran agree to use such an outlet.

He added that it remains unclear whether the Iranian leadership, which is aware of what really happened, would do so.

(JNS).

Syrian missile exploding in Israel wasn’t a deliberate attack, top US general says

0

The Syrian missile exploded in southern Israel, not far from the secretive Dimona nuclear reactor.

A senior US general said on Thursday that he believed a Syrian missile exploding in Israel overnight did not represent an intentional attack, but rather showed a lack of Syrian air defense capability.

“I think it reflects actually incompetence in Syrian air defense… I do not believe it was an intentional attack,” Marine General Kenneth McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, said during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

The missile was fired from Syria towards southern Israel, where the Dimona nuclear reactor is located.

Sirens sounded in Abu Qrenat, a Bedouin village not far from the secretive nuclear site; the Israeli military responded by striking multiple defense batteries in Syria.

“They fired their missiles. The missiles went ballistic — literally — and followed a parabolic trajectory into Israel, where they were intercepted,” McKenzie added. “I do not believe it was an intentional attack but, just, rather, a lack of capability on the part of the Syrian air defenders.”

The assessment echoed that of Israel’s Defense Minister Benny Gantz, who said the missile had landed in Israel as a result of errant Syrian anti-aircraft fire.

Reports of Israeli strikes against Iranian interest, including those in Syria, increased in recent months as the Biden administration attempts to get Iran back into compliance with the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Israel has said it will not tolerate Iranian presence in Syria.

(i24 News).

No strings attached: 330 US lawmakers call for full funding of aid to Israel

0

“There should be no doubt of where Congress stands in our support
for Israel’s security,” Rep. Deutch said.

In an overwhelming rebuke to recent calls by liberal-leaning Democrats to place conditions on U.S. military aid to Israel, 330 U.S. lawmakers – two-thirds of the House of Representatives – urged the House Appropriations Committee to continue its “strong support” for “the full funding of security assistance to Israel,” in a letter sent Thursday.

Representatives were roughly evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. The effort was led by Reps. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) and Michael McCaul (R-Texas).

“One program that enjoys particularly strong bipartisan backing and for which we, Democrats and Republicans, urge your continued strong support is the full funding of security assistance to Israel as authorized in the 2016 U.S.-Israel Memorandum of Understanding (MOU),” the letter said.

The 2016 MOU on U.S. foreign defense aid to Israel was signed during the Obama administration and provides $33 billion in total aid over 10 years. Another $5 billion is provided for ballistic missile defense.

“There should be no doubt of where Congress stands in our support for Israel’s security after an overwhelming majority of Democrats and Republicans signed on to support full funding of security assistance to our closest Middle East ally,” Deutch said in a statement.

The letter was a powerful rejoinder to a bill recently proposed by Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) that seeks to condition aid to Israel over alleged human rights abuses. The bill, titled “Defending the Human Rights of Palestinian Children and Families Living Under Israeli Military Occupation Act,” is similar to one McCollum introduced in 2019.

J Street backed the bill.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) criticized McCollum for the bill and helped boost the letter with a lobbying campaign, according to Jewish Insider.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), at a J Street conference on Monday, also advocated using U.S. military assistance as a means to put pressure on Israel.

“If we’re serious about arresting settlement expansion and helping move the parties toward a two-state solution, then it would be irresponsible not to consider all of the tools we have at our disposal,” said Warren.

“One of those is restricting military aid from being used in the occupied territories. By continuing to provide military aid without restriction, we provide no incentive for Israel to adjust course,” she said.

The letter indirectly addressed the recent criticism, saying, “We recognize that not every Member of Congress will agree with every policy decision of every Israeli government. However as President Biden has stated, ‘I’m not going to place conditions for the security assistance given the serious threats that Israel is facing, and this would be, I think, irresponsible.’”

The letter also spoke of the many benefits accruing to the U.S. from Israeli military prowess and regional strength.

“As America’s closest Mideast ally, Israel regularly provides the United States with unique intelligence information and advanced defensive weapons systems. Israel is also actively engaged in supporting security partners like Jordan and Egypt. And its recent normalization agreements with the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco will help promote regional stability and deal with common challenges from Iran and its terrorist proxies,” the letter noted.

“Just as foreign assistance is an investment in advancing our values and furthering our global interests, security aid to Israel is a specific investment in the peace and prosperity of the entire Middle East,” it said.

(World Israel News).

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com