US Court Throws Out Palestinian ‘Lawfare’ Suit


US Court Throws Out Palestinian ‘Lawfare’ Suit

Written by Andrew Friedman/TPS on August 31, 2017

A US court has thrown out a billion-dollar lawsuit aimed at slashing funding to Israeli charities and institutions in Judea and Samaria, ruling that the institutions benefitting from the donations comply with Treasury Department regulations for non-profit status and that the attempt to block funding was a political question that is outside the jurisdiction of the courts, TPS has learned.

The suit, Al-Tamimi v. Adelson, charged 49 defendants including philanthropist Sheldon Adelson, Texas Pastor John Hagee, media mogul Haim Saban, non-profits such as the Hebron Fund and corporate entities such as Bank Leumi, Motorola and other companies that provide services to the IDF with violating both international law and US policy by supporting Israeli ventures in Judea and Samaria. The plaintiffs originally sought $40 billion in damages which was subsequently scaled down to $1 billion.

While not addressing the details of the case – accusations that financial support to Israeli projects in Judea and Samaria violated American and international law by supporting the “genocide” of Palestinians – Judge Tanya Chutkan ruled with prejudice that the acts detailed in the suit involved “political questions” which were outside the purview of the judicial branch.

The ruling was the second defeat for Palestinian supporters in the US courts in recent months. In June, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia knocked back a request by Palestinian-American author Susan Abulhawa to force the United States Treasury to invalidate the tax-exempt status granted to charities which support humanitarian activities in Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem. They had asked the court to order the Treasury Department to initiate an investigation into the tax-exempt charities and then based on the investigation to revoke the exemption granted to such entities.

However, in June Washington, D.C. District Court Judge Randolph Moss determined that none of the plaintiffs had constitutional standing to bring the suit in federal court. Notably, Abulhawa plaintiffs have appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, but the appeal is still pending.

Attorney Marc Zell, a prominent supporter of right-wing causes in Israel who represented several of the charities named in Al-Tamimi v. Adelson, told TPS that the case was an important victory for Israel in the fight against Palestinian and left-wing attempts to “change the narrative” about Israel and the Palestinians in the court of public opinion.

“I don’t even think the plaintiffs expected this case to survive judicial scrutiny,” said Zell, who also serves as chairman of the Israel branch of Republicans Overseas. “That was never really the point. It was “lawfare”  – the attempt to reshape the narrative of what is going on here between Israel and the Palestinians.

Leave a Reply