Home Opinion ICC rejects human rights claims against China, but continues to pursue Israel

ICC rejects human rights claims against China, but continues to pursue Israel

ICC rejects human rights claims against China, but continues to pursue Israel
International Criminal Court Building in De Hague, The Netherlands. (Photo: Reuters).

The ICC says it will not try China over Uyghur violations because it is not a member state – but then neither are Israel and the US. Op-ed.

In recent days the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague has announced that it will discontinue its investigation of the Chinese government over alleged human rights violations committed against China’s Muslim Uyghur minorities. Lawyers for the Uyghurs had filed a communication against China with the ICC in July 2020.

Correctly, the Chief Prosecutor had swiftly determined that since China is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, and as China is not a member state, the Court had no jurisdiction to further advance any investigations or prosecutions. Accordingly, the ICC informed Beijing it would not proceed even though there was ample evidence of China’s guilt; also, China had refused to carry out its own human rights investigation.

At the same time that the ICC has discharged China from criminal liability, it perniciously continues to pursue two other  non-state  members of the Court, the United States and Israel, for alleged criminal conduct. Although like China neither country is a signatory to the Rome Statute and each country has a robust and independent military court system, The Hague has been engaged in aggressive and unlawful investigations to try and find a legal basis to commence a prosecution.

The ICC is investigating the US military over alleged “war crimes” in Afghanistan. Concerning Israel, the ICC is investigating the IDF over its 2014 Protective Edge Operation against Hamas rocket fire from Gaza.

In addition, the Chief Prosecutor has publicly alleged that Israel’s settlement policy is a violation of Palestinian rights and the Geneva Convention and is investigating that as well. It claims Jewish communities erected in Judea and Samaria would constitute “population transfers” into “occupied territories.”

Under Article 49 of the Geneva Convention: “Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.”

The Geneva Convention, legislated after World War II, was a partial response to the genocidal policies of the Nazi military to capture foreign territory and then deport the native population while settling German speaking individuals in their former homes. That was history’s purest example of ethnic cleansing.

Now the Palestinians, latching onto this provision, allege that Jewish communities built in Judea and Samaria constitute a “mass forcible transfer” by Israel and are illegal under international law.

In order to pursue non-signatory Israel, The Hague had to resort to several underhanded tactics to try and meet the criteria needed for a lawful investigation and prosecution.

Firstly, it had to bestow statehood on the Palestinians and claim they had the capacity to sign the Rome Statute. Secondly, the ICC had to allow the Palestinians to sign the Rome Statute, a clear violation of the Oslo Accords and other international agreements.

Next the ICC had to unilaterally make a determination of “Palestine’s” final borders and decide which areas Israel was actually “occupying”. Shockingly, East Jerusalem, the Old City and Temple Mount were deemed to belong to the Palestinians.

Finally, the ICC rejected Israel’s assertions that it has a robust and independent judiciary. It is Israel’s contention that it always conducted its own independent legal inquiries when allegations of illegal actions were raised and has always prosecuted and punished its own soldiers when it deemed necessary.

After making all these dishonest findings and forced assumptions, the ICC admitted “Palestine” as a state member. The Palestinians swiftly filed a communication with the Chief Prosecutor asking her to investigate Israel and the IDF.

The ICC’s lenient treatment of Chinese human rights violations, vis-a-vis its biased insistence on investigations of Israel and the US, once again displays the politicization of the ICC and the weaponization of international law.

In recent months, the Trump Administration has been extremely active in placing pressure on the ICC to drop its investigations of the US and Israel. Secretary Pompeo has seized the assets of ICC officials, has placed travel bans and other punitive sanctions on them. The Department of State has warned the ICC to discontinue its investigation of non-party members including the US and its allies such as Israel.

The incoming Biden Administration will be under pressure from Europe and the UN to cancel the travel bans and sanctions Washington recently placed on the ICC officials. Many believe the Chief Prosecutor has been patiently waiting until the Democrats assume office in January to announce its indictment of Israel for war crimes.

Without the US’ backing against the ICC, Israel will have a very difficult time defending herself against the blood libels and false allegations.

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner is a prominent Israeli attorney and the president of the Shurat HaDin Law Center in Tel-Aviv. Together with author Samuel Katz she has written the international best-seller HARPOON: Inside Israel’s Covert War Against Terrorism’s Money Masters.

(Arutz 7)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com